Live

Current Product

Clad

AI personal color service

Clad analyzes a user-submitted photo and presents a personal color result with a palette and beauty recommendations. The product focuses on making the reasoning understandable and the result easy to apply.

  • Personal color analysis
  • Palette recommendations
  • Beauty recommendation UX

Clad product screen

Live Clad service

Live
English mobile homepage of the live Clad AI personal color service

Screen details

Live Clad service

The English mobile homepage from the current production service.

Service development record

How the analysis became a usable decision

The same service principles and evidence carry from the moment a photo is submitted to the moment someone understands the result and chooses colors or products.

  1. 01Observation & evidence

    Find where people get stuck after diagnosis

    Question examined
    Where do people curious about personal color face the most friction and uncertainty?
    Decision made
    Focus on a low-friction first analysis and usable next choices, not a replacement for professional diagnosis.
    Evidence used for the decision
    The initial constraints were the time and cost of professional diagnosis, the difficulty of applying a result, and photo variance caused by lighting and editing.
  2. 02Problem & principle

    An understandable starting point, not an absolute answer

    Question examined
    How can a photo-based analysis with uncertainty become a responsible product?
    Decision made
    Explain reasoning and limits, provide a path to retake the photo, and present recommendations as a starting point for exploration.
    Evidence used for the decision
    The product hypothesis was that a season label alone would not help someone understand the result or apply it to a color decision.
  3. 03Hypothesis & scope

    One core flow from photo to recommendation

    Question examined
    Which user journey must the first version complete?
    Decision made
    Concentrate on photo preparation, analysis, explanation, palette, and beauty recommendations without recreating every context of professional diagnosis.
    Evidence used for the decision
    The smallest useful result was defined as a choice someone could understand and reference immediately—not merely a type label.
  4. 04Experience & system

    Build the experience around the model

    Question examined
    How should the analysis capability become a dependable service experience?
    Decision made
    Connect input validation, an AI vision workflow, result normalization, palette and recommendation UI, cloud delivery, and observation.
    Evidence used for the decision
    Flutter, Python, Terraform, and explicit error and retry boundaries were selected for a system that can be operated directly at its current scale.
  5. 05Launch & learning

    Treat launch as the start of observation

    Question examined
    Does the result support a real choice beyond producing an interesting answer?
    Decision made
    Use result-explanation views, palette and recommendation exploration, reasons for reanalysis, and qualitative feedback as signals for the next iteration.
    Evidence used for the decision
    Observation currently centers on explanation clarity and recommendation confidence; outcomes are not claimed before meaningful evidence accumulates.
Signals used for the next decision
Current focus
Clarity of result explanations
Decision signals
Palette and recommendation exploration, plus reasons for reanalysis
Improvement loop
User feedback → small change → observe again

These are inputs for the next operating or validation decision, not outcomes already achieved.

System architecture

One path from photo to recommendation

Clad combines photo validation, AI-assisted color analysis, result normalization, palette generation, and recommendation mapping in one guided experience.

Input Layer

Photo upload, validation, image preparation

AI Workflow

Vision analysis, prompt pipeline, result normalization

Product Layer

Result explanation, palette UI, recommendation mapping

Operations Layer

Analytics, feedback, iteration backlog

Current priorities

Improve result explanation
Add better palette visualization
Collect user feedback
Refine recommendation quality
Support more localized beauty guidance

The question I want feedback on now

Which part of the result helped you understand it, and where did choosing from the palette or recommendations become difficult?